FPRA 2009 Annual Conference: What Do You Think of the Conference Coverage?

We’re now at the halfway point of the conference and figured it was a good time to ask what you think about our conference coverage thus far. Tell us the good, the bad and the ugly. We’d prefer if you left your e-mail so we can respond to you, but if you feel the need to be anonymous, go ahead.

What has been your favorite portion of the conference coverage?

Do you like the fact that we’ve included commentary on the sessions or would you just prefer the facts from presentations?

Do you like the fun stuff and hallway interviews?

Suggestions?

  1. Amanda Forbes says:

    Love the fun stuff and hallway interviews. I think Mr. Technology is my favorite post thus far. But really, those types of posts give the conference coverage a personality and allows those of us who couldn’t be in attendance feel like we’re in the mix. And please keep the blog coverage coming. As a member who couldn’t make it to conference this year, it’s allowed me to get a taste for what I missed. Keep up the great work Chris, Josh and Paul!

  2. Rachael Gmerek says:

    I’ve enjoyed following both Twitter and the blog! I find myself following twitter throughout the day, then clicking on the links for more coverage in the blog posts. Thank you again for allowing those of us who are unable to attend this year, to be a part of the conference… and thanks to those who have volunteered their time to make this happen! =)

  3. Chris Gent says:

    Thanks, Amanda, for all your help in serving as our blog editor. We certainly could not have done it without your help from afar!

  1. There are no trackbacks for this post yet.

Leave a Reply